Medical practice credentialing is an essential process that enables organizations to deliver safe, reimbursable healthcare services. It involves verifying that providers (clinicians and, in some cases, specific service lines) meet the qualification standards that ensure they’re able to deliver high-quality patient care.
While credentialing is foundational to clinician onboarding and health plan enrollment procedures, it can be complex and time-consuming. We’ll clarify how the process works, offer an example administrative workflow, and highlight some best practices to help you strengthen your approach. With a better understanding (and practical tips), you can improve your regulatory compliance and protect the trust that allows for effective patient care and intersystem coordination.
The Credentialing Process for Medical Practices
At its core, medical practice credentialing is a series of administrative actions that protect patient safety, regulatory compliance, and the revenue cycle. When onboarding an individual provider (such as a nurse practitioner or physician), credentialing checklists often look similar to the workflow example outlined below:
Gather Provider Information
Credentialing begins with the collection of key personal and professional details, including name, date of birth, education, licensure, and past work history. Many organizations rely on credentialing resources like the Council for Affordable Quality Healthcare's (CAQH) Proview, an optional (but heavily used) database which provides a centralized source for this information.
Verify Credentials and Information
Once collected, provider information must undergo primary source verification (PSV). This involves authenticating the provider’s details (like their license and education information) directly with the original issuing authority.
Perform Background Checks
Here, credentialing teams review the provider’s background information for any possible red flags. This typically involves a criminal background check in addition to professional screening measures, like querying the National Practitioner Data Bank (NPDB). Through the latter, any previous professional sanctions, reportable actions, or licensure issues can be evaluated.
Apply for Health Plan Enrollment
With all the necessary authenticated information in place, credentialing staff can submit applications to enroll providers with health plans. This step is often the most time-intensive, as insurance and third-party payer requirements (and timeline) can vary significantly.
Complete Internal Approvals
Some organizations require an internal review (such as credential committee or executive signoff) prior to allowing a provider to begin practicing. Once approved, providers are fully cleared to deliver services and bill for them, having been added to revenue systems and granted electronic health record (EHR) access.
Provide Ongoing Monitoring
Credentialing is an ongoing process that requires maintenance. Tracking license expirations and completing periodic re-credentialing or re-attestations ensures that provider profiles remain current, minimizing the risk of credentialing or qualification lapses that jeopardize revenue.
In-House Credentialing vs. Third-Party Vendors
The needs of health organizations vary by size, specialty, mission, and more. These differences influence how provider credentialing is best approached. Yet, a key decision (shared by all facility types) is whether to handle the credentialing process with an in-house team or through a third-party vendor.
In-house credentialing teams offer:
- Greater oversight and control over program management and implementation.
- Potential for long-term cost control, as expenses are tied to staffing and the chosen credentialing software system.
- More direct communication and better accessibility for providers throughout the process.
Third-party credentialing vendors offer:
- Specialized expertise which can support better compliance and credentialing outcomes.
- Potential for faster turnaround times, due to highly focused workflows.
- Reduced administrative burden on internal staff, lowering operational strain.
Medical Practice Credentialing: Common Errors
While credentialing providers, certain red flags (like a history of multiple malpractice suits) can reveal safety and service concerns. With process-related faults, red flags are typically related to common credentialing errors. Left unchecked, a broken process not only jeopardizes effective billing, it can compromise regulatory compliance and patient trust. Common medical credentialing mistakes include the following:
Providing Incomplete (or Inaccurate) Information
Missing information and documentation is the most frequent credentialing mistake, contributing to enrollment delays and billing challenges. It’s important to take the time to ensure that all the required information is complete and accurate.
Approving Providers to Work Prematurely
Faced with short staffing challenges, many facilities are eager for clinicians to begin working as soon as possible. Yet allowing them full clinical privileges before credentialing is complete risks proper reimbursement and noncompliance.
Underestimating the Time and Resources Required
Credentialing can be a lengthy process, taking anywhere from 90-180 days to complete. Lack of dedicated administrators and time can lead to delays from faulty communication, poor PSV, step-by-step stalls, and increased risk of information-based errors.
Using a Disorganized Credentialing Approach
When credentialing teams don’t use a standardized approach (with overlapping responsibilities and unclear process steps), delays become inevitable. Responsibilities should be clearly designated, with a standard step-by-step process to reduce the risk of errors, delays, and duplicate efforts.
Neglecting Recredentialing Dates and Requirements
The standard medical credentials list of requirements may look finite, but the process itself is ongoing. Recredentialing dates often have strict deadlines, and missing those important certification renewals, verification rechecks, and re-attestation deadlines can compromise a provider’s ability to work and bill for their services.
Credential Management for Medical Practices: Best Practices
Managing medical practice credentialing doesn’t have to be a hassle. Here are some best practices to help simplify and streamline your processes for more effective administrative workflows, strengthening clinical and organizational operations in turn.
1. Centralize Provider Data Into a Single Source
To avoid making the most common credentialing mistake, it’s important to ensure that your provider information is consistently complete and accurate. The best way to accomplish this is by maintaining a single, reliable source of provider data. For many organizations, this means utilizing CAQH Proview, the free data repository for provider data and documentation.
Tip: Maintain an internal credentialing data file (even if it’s in conjunction with the CAQH database) that uses a standard organization system, so all providers’ information is always immediately accessible and consistent.
2. Standardize the Credential Verification Process
Establishing a consistent, standardized approach to credentialing helps improve the process’s efficiency and effectiveness. Clearly defined workflows with designated responsibilities for each team member can further ensure that every step of the process is completed accurately and in a timely manner.
Tip: Implement a standard credentialing checklist as the workflow protocol, building it into your credentialing software platform to encourage participation with the step-by-step approach.
3. Automate Credentialing Where Possible
Many administrative workflows can benefit from developing technologies like artificial intelligence (AI). With credentialing, automating low-value tasks within the process can save overhead costs while ensuring better accuracy. For example, a machine is able to verify the comprehensiveness of provider data at a much higher speed than with manual checks.
Tip: At a minimum, use automated reminders or system flags for important re-credentialing dates. This can ensure that deadlines aren’t accidentally missed.
4. Track Credentialing Metrics for Potential Improvement
Evidence-based practice isn’t limited to the clinical space. Using data to improve administrative processes is equally important. It can identify gaps within medical practice credentialing processes, highlighting areas that require improvement and revealing systemic strengths. Some key credentialing metrics worth tracking include:
- Credentialing turnaround time
- Provider information completion rate
- Application error or rejection rate
- Primary source verification completion time
- Recredentialing completion rate
Tip: Using a spreadsheet (or dedicated software) can help reveal gradual trends or patterns, informing more specific and measurable credentialing objectives.
5. Leverage Credential Verification Partners for Better Efficiency
Credentialing can be complex, particularly for healthcare facilities with multiple specialty services or high staff volumes. To improve efficiency in these cases, organizations shouldn’t be afraid to delegate credentialing or leverage third-party vendors for support with specific tasks. This can help reduce the in-house administrative workload while improving credentialing efficiency.
Tip: Identify specific organizational pain points (like credentialing delays due to high staff turnover) and vet industry-leading, third-party vendors who can help address those specific issues.
Looking for Help to Optimize Your Onboarding?
Need help boosting your medical practice credentialing metrics? Use our industry-leading job board and connect with nursing professionals who are already verified, saving you time and administrative hassle while filling your vacancies fast.